Legal Opinion

Hobbs v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided September 15, 1981No. 80-943PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

Affirmed. There is no evidence that any pending investigation of the witness went to the heart of appellant’s defense or arose out of the same criminal episode giving rise to the charges against appellant. Fulton v. State, 335 So.2d 280 (Fla.1976); Chavers v. State, 380 So.2d 1180 (Fla. 5th DCA 1980), cert. denied, 388 So.2d 1118 (Fla.1980). We find the cases cited by appellant inapplicable to the facts of this case as the witness had not been acting as an undercover officer in the defendant’s home, Sarmiento v. State, 371 So.2d 1047 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979), or as paid informant, Blanco v. State,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Fulton v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1976
  2. Stripling v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1977
  3. Sarmiento v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1979
  4. Blanco v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1977
  5. Chavers v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Financial Indem. Co. v. Steele & Sons, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API