Legal Opinion

Eastburn v. Ford Motor Co.

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided February 3, 1971No. 29865PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOHN. R. BROWN, Chief Judge:

The Florida question in this diversity case is whether the applicable statute of limitations in a products liability case is *126the three-year statute1 for contract cases or is the four-year period for those cases not otherwise “specifically provided for”.2

The District Judge apparently reasoned that Florida concepts of strict liability in consumer cases are related to warranties — normally a branch of contracts — and held for the three-year period (note 1, supra) as is required in a “contract case.” We reverse because we are Sne-bound by a Florida case that now…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. United States v. SeckingerSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Creviston v. General Motors CorporationSupreme Court of Florida · 1969
  3. United States v. M. O. Seckinger, Jr., T/a M. O. Seckinger CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
  4. Miami Parts & Spring, Inc. v. Champion Spark Plug CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1966
  5. Barfield v. United States Rubber CompanyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1970

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Mississippi Power Company v. Joseph Roubicek and Mallory Pierce, D/B/A Associated EngineersCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1972
  2. Eastburn v. Ford Motor CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API