People v. Faxel
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
THOMPSON, J.
This appeal from a conviction of robbery presents an issue apparently novel to the law of California. Involving a juxtaposition of the principles underlying Faretta v. California (1975) 422 U.S. 806 [45 L.Ed.2d 562, 95 S.Ct. 2525] and the constitutional right to effective representation, the matter at bench concerns the self-represented defendant’s right to state financed services ancillary to representation. In particular, this appeal raises the question of the nature of the showing that must be made by a self-represented defendant to require the appointment by the trial…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Charles Earl Brubaker v. Fred R. Dickson, Warden of the California State Prison at San Quentin, CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1962
- State v. KnappArizona Supreme Court · 1977
- Prudhomme v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
- Eugene Mason v. State of Arizona, A. E. Gomes, Superintendent, Arizona State Prison AtflorenceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- People v. BlairCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005
- Keenan v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
- Corenevsky v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
- State v. CornellArizona Supreme Court · 1994
- Sand v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.