Legal Opinion

Dickson v. Hertz Corp.

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided March 4, 1983Published

1Opinion of the Court

The sole question on appeal is who owned the automobile at the time it was stolen. The plaintiff claims that the automobile, which he had been driving under a lease arrangement with the defendant (Hertz), and had agreed to purchase, remained the property of Hertz until such time as he registered the automobile in his own name. Hertz claims that the sale and transfer of ownership took place, at the latest, when Hertz completed the documents of title and mailed them to the plaintiff, Dickson. Dickson disclaimed ownership of the automobile when it was recovered after the theft, and brought this…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Royal Bank of Canada v. ConnollyMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1980
  2. Fireman's Fund Insurance Companies v. BlaisMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1982
  3. Perkins v. Frank J. Cole, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1946

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API