Blair v. Luning
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the city and county of San Francisco. The action was brought to foreclose a street assessment for work done in the city and county of San Francisco under the street law of April 1, 1872. The further facts *e stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtMcFarland, J.
This is an action to foreclose a lien for certain street work in the city and county of San Francisco, viz.: “Reconstructing the sidewalks on Hyde Street, from Broadway to Pacific Street, and for planking the roadway thereof.” Judgment went for plaintiffs, and defendant appeals.
The only point made by appellant is, that the assessment was absolutely void because no work was done on the sidewalks. It appears from the findings that the specifications in the sealed proposals required certain work to be done on the sidewalks, “where not already constructed”; but it turned out that all the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Himmelmann v. HoadleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1872
- Boyle v. HitchcockCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884
- Hartson v. HardinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1870
3Cited by1 opinion
- De Haven v. BerendesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901