Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Ballow v. PHICO Insurance Co.

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided November 15, 1993No. 92SC530Published

1ConcurrenceJustice Erickson

specially concurring in the result:

I specially concur in the reversal of the court of appeals, but for reasons that differ in some respects from those set forth in the majority opinion. I agree with the majority that the court of appeals erred in deciding the insurance contract was unambiguous. I would hold the insurance contracts between the physicians and PHICO Insurance Company (PHICO) were continuous contracts breached by PHICO.

I

A civil action was commenced by 105 “independent physicians” against PHICO for damages based on fraud, breach of contract, negligent misrepresentation, bad faith,…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance v. BarrySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Travelers Insurance Co. v. SavioSupreme Court of Colorado · 1985
  3. Farmers Group, Inc. v. TrimbleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1984
  4. Pepcol Manufacturing Co. v. Denver Union Corp.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1984
  5. Sparks v. St. Paul InsuranceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1985

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API