Ballow v. PHICO Insurance Co.
Supreme Court of Colorado
1ConcurrenceJustice Erickson
specially concurring in the result:
I specially concur in the reversal of the court of appeals, but for reasons that differ in some respects from those set forth in the majority opinion. I agree with the majority that the court of appeals erred in deciding the insurance contract was unambiguous. I would hold the insurance contracts between the physicians and PHICO Insurance Company (PHICO) were continuous contracts breached by PHICO.
I
A civil action was commenced by 105 “independent physicians” against PHICO for damages based on fraud, breach of contract, negligent misrepresentation, bad faith,…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance v. BarrySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Travelers Insurance Co. v. SavioSupreme Court of Colorado · 1985
- Farmers Group, Inc. v. TrimbleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1984
- Pepcol Manufacturing Co. v. Denver Union Corp.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1984
- Sparks v. St. Paul InsuranceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1985
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.