Legal Opinion

Wm. Deering & Co. v. Grundy County National Bank

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided October 21, 1890PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from Qrundy District Court.— Hon. C. F. Couch, Judge. Action brought by plaintiffs to recover the possession of certain promissory notes. Upon filing its answer, defendant asked to have the cause transferred to the equity docket, and that was done, and the cause was thereafter treated as in equity. After a hearing upon the merits, judgment was rendered in favor of defendant. The plaintiffs appeal. Í

1Opinion of the CourtRobinson, J.

Mrs. F. B. Dodd succeeded her deceased husband as agent for plaintiffs at Grundy-Center, and acted as such agent during the year 1887. The business was carried on with the aid of a brother-in-law named E. H. Dodd, and included the sale of binders, mowers, attachments and appurtenances of various kinds, including extras and repairs, and binding twine. The contract of agency required Mrs. Dodd to make all notes taken payable to the order of plaintiffs, on blanks to be furnished by them. The notes in suit amounting to three hundred and twenty-four dollars, exclusive of interest, were so taken…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Eadie, Guilford & Co. v. AshbaughSupreme Court of Iowa · 1876
  2. Elwell v. . ChamberlinNew York Court of Appeals · 1864
  3. Davenport Savings Fund & Loan Ass'n v. North American Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1864
  4. Roberts v. RumleySupreme Court of Iowa · 1882
  5. Farrar v. PetersonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1879

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Midland Linseed Co. v. American Liquid Fireproofing Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1918
  2. Higbee v. TrumbauerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1900
  3. Moffitt-West Drug Co. v. LynemanColorado Court of Appeals · 1897
  4. Day v. MerrickSupreme Court of Iowa · 1912
  5. Moffitt-West Drug Co. v. LynemanColorado Court of Appeals · 1897

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API