Paxton-Eckman Chemical Co. v. Mundell
Indiana Court of Appeals
From Clinton Circuit Court; Joseph Combs, Judge. Action by Joseph O. Mundell against the Paxton-Eekman Chemical Company. From a judgment for plaintiff, the defendant appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtMoran, J.
Appellee purchased of appellant a large quantity of stock powders, and in the purchase thereof he alleges in his complaint that he was damaged by reason of fraud and deceit being practiced upon him by appellant. Upon issues being joined by an answer in general denial addressed to the complaint and a trial had thereon, a verdict was returned in favor of appellee in the sum of $1,750. From a judgment on the verdict, appellant has appealed, presenting for consideration of the court the sufficiency of the complaint to withstand a demurrer for the want of facts.
The principal averments of the…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Ray v. BakerIndiana Supreme Court · 1905
- Nysewander v. LowmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
- Picard v. McCormickMichigan Supreme Court · 1862
- N. C. Antle & Bro. v. SextonIllinois Supreme Court · 1891
- Tyler v. AndersonIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Shaver Motors, Inc. v. Mills (In Re Mills)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Indiana · 1988
- Vernon Fire & Casualty Insurance Co. v. ThatcherIndiana Court of Appeals · 1972
- Clarke Auto Co. v. ReynoldsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1949
- Van Spanje v. HostettlerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1918
- City of Muncie v. State Ex Rel. WallingIndiana Supreme Court · 1937
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.