Legal Opinion

O'Fallon v. Farmers Insurance Exchange

Montana Supreme Court

Decided August 30, 1993No. 92-024PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Trieweiler

Plaintiffs brought this action to recover damages based upon defendants’ alleged violation of § 33-18-201, MCA, and for malicious prosecution. The District Court dismissed both claims pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6), M.R.Civ.P., for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. Plaintiffs appeal from the judgment entered pursuant to the District Court’s order of dismissal. We reverse the District Court.

The issues are:

1. Did the District Court err when it dismissed, with prejudice, plaintiffs’ claim for malicious prosecution?

2. Did the District Court err when it dismissed, with…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Leslie Fudge v. Penthouse International, Ltd., Leslie Fudge v. Penthouse International, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1988
  2. Bradshaw v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Klaudt v. FlinkMontana Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Frey v. StonemanArizona Supreme Court · 1986
  5. First Bank (N.A.) — Billings v. ClarkMontana Supreme Court · 1989

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. Lorang v. Fortis InsuranceMontana Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Sunburst School District No. 2 v. Texaco, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Hovet v. Allstate InsuranceNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Plouffe v. Montana Department of Public Health & Human ServicesMontana Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Larson v. StateMontana Supreme Court · 2019

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API