Legal Opinion

Daniels v. Russell

New York Supreme Court

Decided March 19, 1975PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLeo Brown, J.

This is a motion by the plaintiffs for an order removing and transferring the action from the Civil Court to this court "upon the ground that said Civil Court does not have jurisdiction to grant the relief to which the plaintiffs are entitled”, and further granting leave to serve an amended bill of particulars on the ground that "the damages *776sustained by plaintiffs are greater in amount than set forth in the original Bill of Particulars.”

The sole basis on which the application is predicated is that the special damages set forth in the original bill of particulars although it alleged that…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Huston v. RaoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
  2. Francilion v. EpsteinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
  3. La Placa v. BoorsteinNew York Supreme Court · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API