Legal Opinion

Respess v. . Spinning Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided May 27, 1926PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The plaintiffs, copartners doing business as public accountants under the name of Respess Respess, brought suit against the defendant, a corporation, to recover for services rendered in auditing and reporting the condition of the defendant's business. On the trial the plaintiffs offered in evidence the following resolution appearing in the minutes of a regular annual meeting of the stockholders of the defendant held on 6 February, 1923: "Mr. W. D. Adams offered the following resolution in writing, to wit: Resolved that Allen J. Graham, W. C. Wilkinson and W. D. Adams be authorized to employ…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Collins v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  2. Courtney v. . ParkerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1917
  3. Cleveland Cotton Mills v. Commissioners of Cleveland CountySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1891
  4. Covington v. . ThreadgillSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1883
  5. Morris v. . BasnightSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1920

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. S & W Realty & Bonded Commercial Agency, Inc. v. Duckworth & Shelton, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  2. Tom Welch Accounting Service v. WalbyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Duggins v. North Carolina State Board of Certified Public Accountant ExaminersCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1975
  4. Dane v. BrownCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1934
  5. Johnson v. DelaneIdaho Supreme Court · 1955

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API