Legal Opinion · Dissent

People v. Wehrwein

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided October 16, 1989No. 1-87-1487Published

1Dissent

PRESIDING JUSTICE MANNING,

dissenting:

I must respectfully dissent. The State has a heavy burden in a criminal case. It must prove each element of the offense beyond a reasonable doubt by competent evidence. (In re Winship (1970), 397 U.S. 358, 364, 25 L. Ed. 2d 368, 375, 90 S. Ct. 1068, 1073.) I have searched the record for facts which support the allegation that defendant possessed a stolen motor vehicle. I have yet to find any such facts. Evidence regarding who owned, possessed or had control over the truck, at the time it was allegedly stolen, is likewise lacking.

To warrant a conviction…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. People v. PickettIllinois Supreme Court · 1973
  3. People v. DavisAppellate Court of Illinois · 1984
  4. People v. WilliamsAppellate Court of Illinois · 1986
  5. People v. ClarkAppellate Court of Illinois · 1982

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API