Legal Opinion
Mergenthaler Linotype Co. v. Gore
Supreme Court of Florida
Decided March 25, 1935PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWhitfield, C. J.
In an action of replevin brought by Mergenthaler Linotype Company, a corporation under the laws of New York, against Ralph K. Gore, it was in effect stipulated that judgment be entered upon the facts as stipulated, which in substance are as follows:
“1. Plaintiff, Mergenthaler Linotype Company, * * * is and has been continuously since October 1, 1922, a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of New York, with its office and place of business in New York City, engaged in the manufacture and sale in interstate commerce of linotype machines.
“2. Ralph K. Gore, the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Mergenthaler Linotype Co. v. Spokesman Publishing Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1928
- Circular Advertising Co. v. American Mercantile Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1913
- American Mercantile Co. v. Circular Advertising Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1916
3Cited by4 opinions
- Stevens-Davis Co. v. StockSupreme Court of Florida · 1940
- Kar Products, Inc. v. AckerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1969
- Sholtz v. State Ex Rel. Ben Hur Life Ass'nSupreme Court of Florida · 1935
- Waterman Bic-Pen Corp. v. Manncraft Exhibitors Service, Inc.Dade County Civil and Criminal Court of Record · 1968