Legal Opinion

Kinard v. State

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided June 4, 1976PublishedCited by 53 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This petition for certiorari presents two issues for our determination:

1. Was there a valid warrantless seizure of the pills from petitioner's vehicle by reason of the "plain view" doctrine?

2. Was the seizure of the marihuana, subsequently discovered after a warrantless search of the vehicle, justified under the "exigent circumstances and probable cause" exception?

We answer both questions in the negative. We reverse and remand the judgment of affirmance of the Court of Criminal Appeals.

Simply stated, the facts are these. Officer Lundy stopped petitioner's van truck solely for "an I.D. check."…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Stanley v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  4. Brantley v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1975
  5. Shipman v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1973

3Cited by53 opinions

  1. Temple v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1978
  2. Travis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1997
  3. Ex Parte TuckerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1995
  4. Rokitski v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1997
  5. State v. MitchellCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1998

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API