Legal Opinion
Schuylkill Transp. Co. v. Banks
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided August 3, 1944No. 563; No. 51 of 1943; No. 3 of 1944Published
1Opinion of the Court
BARD, District Judge.
This case involves two actions in admiralty which were by agreement consolidated for purposes of trial. No. 51 of 1943 is an action by Schuylkill Transportation Company (hereinafter called Schuylkill) as owner of Coal Boat No. 563, and as bailee of a cargo of coal laden thereon, against Charles T. Banks and Flo L. Banks, individually and trading as Charles T. Banks Towing Line (hereinafter referred to as Banks) and the Tug “Grace Ann,” her engines, etc., to recover damages for the sinking of the barge “563” while being towed by the respondents’ Tug “Grace Ann,” allegedly…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Stevens v. the White CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- The Clarence L. BlakesleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1917
- Shaw v. Dempsey Sons Barge Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1931
- The Atlantic CityCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1917
- Delaware Dredging Co. v. GrahamDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1930
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.