Henrick v. Coats Co.

1. As nobody was in a position to compute the volume of air which the tire in question was designed to hold because nobody knew the diameter *977of the cross section of the tire and because there was no evidence as to the range of possible diameters, there was no error in the rulings of the judge by which he excluded the estimates of the plaintiff s expert of the amounts of energy which would have been released by the explosion of the tire when inflated to various pressures. By the same token, it was error to allow the defendant’s experts to give their respective estimates of the lengths of time…