Legal Opinion

Overstreet v. Commonwealth

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided December 3, 1951No. Record 3849PublishedCited by 16 opinions

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the CourtSpeatley, J.

Carson T. Overstreet, sometimes hereinafter referred to as defendant, complains of a judgment finding him guilty of a misdemeanor, a violation of section 43-13, Code of Virginia, 1950. Upon his plea of not guilty, a jury being waived, the court heard the case. His sentence was fixed at a fine of $100 and confinement in jail for thirty days. He asks us to set aside his conviction on the ground,—first, that the judgment is contrary to the law and the evidence, and, second, that Code, section 43-13 is unconstitutional, in that it authorizes the deprivation of one’s property without due process…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Pauly v. KeeblerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1921
  2. People v. HolderCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
  3. State v. HertzogSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1912
  4. State v. WilliamsWashington Supreme Court · 1925
  5. Commercial National Bank v. SmithSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1932

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Daugherty v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Vansant and Gusler, Inc. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1993
  3. Makarov v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1976
  4. Kayhoe Construction Corp. v. United Virginia BankSupreme Court of Virginia · 1979
  5. People v. WhippleMichigan Court of Appeals · 1993

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API