Legal Opinion

Sandlin v. Henry

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided April 6, 1937No. 27039PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtPhelps, J.

Among other forms of relief prayed for, this action was one for possession of real estate. The trial court held that plaintiff had no interest in the property and denied her recovery, from which judgment she appeals.

Plaintiff’s first contention is that the court erred in denying her application for a continuance. The ground set forth for the continuance was sickness of the plaintiff. She had had one continuance prior to trial, on the same ground, and when she sought the continuance on the occasion now under consideration, the defendant contended that she, the plaintiff, was not ill, and…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Sipes v. PerdomoSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Boys v. LongSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API