Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

People v. Letendre

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided September 30, 1999Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Mikoll, J. P. (concurring in part and dissenting in part).

I respectfully dissent from that portion of the majority’s decision which finds no error in County Court’s denial of defendant’s suppression motion.

Mindful that the analysis required of a court when determining whether the People have met their burden of demonstrating probable cause for an arrest is essentially the same as that applied when passing on an application for an arrest or search warrant (see, People v Parris, 83 NY2d 342, 346; People v Dodt, 61 NY2d 408, 415; People v Bouton, 50 NY2d 130, 135), my review of the Dunaway…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. People v. HicksNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
  2. People v. DodtNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
  3. People v. JohnsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
  4. People v. ParrisNew York Court of Appeals · 1994
  5. People v. BoutonNew York Court of Appeals · 1980

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API