Covey v. Williamson

I proposed the adoption of the following as a per curiam opinion:

“Within the time provided by law this appeal from the substitute titles submitted by the Attorney General was filed and presents only one question, the , sufficiency of said proposed substitute titles.

“On such appeal this court ‘may correct or amend the title before the court, or accept the substitute suggested, or may draft a new one which will conform to this chapter”. 34 O.S.1951 § 10; State ex rel. Murray v. Beard, Okl.Sup., 264 P.2d 305.

“Without criticism of any of the various titles suggested; we think that the following…