Legal Opinion
Crossman v. Astrue
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided March 16, 2010No. 3:08cv01823 (MRK)PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RULING AND ORDER
MARK R. KRAVITZ, District Judge.
Plaintiff Christina Crossman brings this action pursuant to the Social Security Act (“the Act”), 42 U.S.C. §§ 405(g) and 1383(c)(3), seeking review of a final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security (“Commissioner”) denying her application for disability benefits. Ms. Crossman claims that the decision of the Administrative Law Judge (“ALJ”) was not supported by substantial evidence and was contrary to the applicable legal standards. See generally PL’s Mem. Supp. of Mot. for Order Reversing the Decision of the Commissioner, or, in the…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Ysabel Rosa v. John S. Callahan, Acting Commissioner of Social SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
- Sullivan v. ZebleySupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Burgess v. AstrueCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2008
- Elmer G. Berry v. Richard Schweiker, Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1982
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Abdulrahman v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2022
- Acevedo v. KijakaziDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2021
- Avila v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2019
- Calhoun v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2021
- Cutright v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2021
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.