Legal Opinion

Hamel v. Hamel

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided March 21, 1985No. 84-42PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FERREN, Associate Judge:

Appellant Doris Hamel filed a motion to establish her visitation rights as the noncustodial parent. In response, the trial court ordered her to consult with a court-designated psychiatrist, who had met with the family for several years, so that the court, before ruling, could receive an expert recommendation for an appropriate visitation schedule. The court also ordered appellant not to visit with her children until she had met with the psychiatrist. Appellant contends that the court’s order (1) improperly delegated to the psychiatrist the court’s own judicial…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Moore v. MooreDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1978
  2. Nancy E.M. v. Kenneth D.M.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  3. Rinehimer v. RinehimerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  4. Shapiro v. ShapiroCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1983
  5. Surrey v. SurreyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1958

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. In re S.C.M.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1995
  2. In Re Justin D.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2000
  3. Wilkins v. FergusonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2007
  4. Galbis v. NadalDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1993
  5. Maybin v. StewartDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2005

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API