Legal Opinion

Goad v. Obernagel

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided November 8, 1939PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Dady

The plaintiff, Chloe Goad, brought this suit in the circuit court of St. Clair county under the Dramshop Act to recover damages for personal injuries sustained by her. The tavern keeper, Carrie Hitch, who does not join in this appeal, and George Obernagel and Peter Obernagel, the owners of the premises on which the tavern was located, were made defendants. On a trial before the court with a jury, judgment was entered on the verdict in favor of the plaintiff for the sum of $1,000 against all of the defendants. The owners of the premises appeal.

The undisputed facts are that during the night of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. The People v. HanischIllinois Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Carroll v. KrauseAppellate Court of Illinois · 1938
  3. Schultz v. GilbertAppellate Court of Illinois · 1939
  4. Jones v. EsenbergAppellate Court of Illinois · 1939

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Cole v. BrundageAppellate Court of Illinois · 1976
  2. Foster v. BilbruckAppellate Court of Illinois · 1959
  3. Hanck v. Ruan Transport Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1954
  4. Cox v. HraskyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1943
  5. Bartels v. McGarveyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1947

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API