Legal Opinion

People v. Trotman

Kingston City Court

Decided January 16, 1979PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*341OPINION OF THE COURT

Hubert A. Richter, J.

Defendants, mandatory youthful offenders, pursuant to CPL 340.40 (subd 7) move to have this court declare said section of the law unconstitutional as depriving them of a jury trial.

The defendants challenging the law claim, quoting Judge Scancarelli in the case of People v Carolyn S. (92 Misc 2d 674, 675-676) that:

"CPL 340.40 (subd 7) requires a single Judge nonjury trial for a defendant who is accorded mandatory youthful offender status in a local criminal court proceeding. The Legislature justifies its denial to a class of defendants of the right to a…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Baldwin v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. People v. Carolyn S.Mount Vernon City Court · 1977

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. People v. Robert Z., New York County Courts1986
  2. Gold v. GartensteinNew York Supreme Court · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API