Legal Opinion

Hardaway v. County of Lexington

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided May 9, 1994No. 24067PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Moore, Justice:

This appeal is from an order in a capital murder case ordering appellant (County) to pay costs and attorneys’ fees in excess of those provided under the Defense of Indigents Act. In so ruling, the trial judge retroactively applied our decision in Bailey v. State, — S.C. —, 424 S.E. (2d) 503 (1992).

We reverse.

FACTS

Respondents are attorneys who were appointed to represent Robert Haskell Southerland, an indigent defendant in a capital murder case tried before our decision in Bailey was issued. Respondents moved for the trial judge to set reasonable hourly rate for attorneys’ fees…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Russo v. SuttonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1992
  2. Toth v. Square D CompanySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1989
  3. Bailey v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1992
  4. Lindsay v. Southern Farm Bureau Casualty InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1972
  5. State v. Southern Farm Bureau Life InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1975

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Davenport v. Cotton Hope Plantation Horizontal Property RegimeSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1998
  2. Olson v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1994
  3. Roberts v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1995
  4. Greeley v. County of YorkSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1995
  5. In Re KingsmoreUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. South Carolina · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API