Legal Opinion

In re Crest Sensitivity Treatment & Protection Toothpaste Marketing & Sales Practices Litigation

United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation

Decided June 11, 2012No. MDL No. 2348PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER DENYING TRANSFER

W. ROYAL FURGESON, JR., Acting Chairman.

Before the Panel: * Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1407, plaintiffs in an action pending in the Southern District of Ohio move to centralize this litigation in that district. The motion encompasses three actions— movants’ action, one action pending in the Northern District of California and one action pending in the District of New Jersey, as listed on Schedule A.

Although all responding parties support centralization, there is disagreement as to the choice of an appropriate transferee district. Plaintiff in the action pending in the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In Re Eli Lilly & Co.(cephalexin Monohydrate)United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 1978

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. In re Kashi Co. Marketing & Sales Practices LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2013
  2. In re California Wine Inorganic Arsenic Levels Products Liability LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2015
  3. In re Trans Union LLC Fair Credit Reporting ActUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2013
  4. In re Waggin' Train Chicken Jerky Pet Treat Products Liability LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2012
  5. In re American Home Realty Network, Inc.United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2013

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API