Legal Opinion

Mutual Hail Insurance v. Wilde

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided January 15, 1879PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Error from tbe district court of Cuming county.. Tbe facts are sufficiently stated in tbe opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtLake, J.

The action below was brought on a policy of - insurance issued by the plaintiff in error to the defendant in error to recover damages alleged to have resulted from a partial destruction of certain growing crops, covered by said policy, by a hail storm. There was also a second cause of action by which the small sum of four dollars was claimed for the use of a team, ■etc., in conveying certain persons who were acting as appraisers for the company from place to place in Cuming and Dodge counties. The trial on issues joined resulted in favor of the plaintiff in the action, and the defendant…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Washington Mutual Insurance v. Merchants & Manufacturers' Mutual InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 1856

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Olive v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1881
  2. Gray v. Reliable Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
  3. Howell v. Wilcox & Gibbs Sewing Machine Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1881

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API