Legal Opinion

Sinclair Refining Co. v. Shakespeare

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided December 9, 1946No. 15,519PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Stone

Plaintiff in error, as tenant, occupied certain premises owned by defendants in error, herein designated as landlord, or plaintiffs, under written lease for a term of five years at a, rental of fifty dollars per month. Prior to the expiration of the term of the lease an extension agreement was executed by the parties whereunder the tenant held possession for a further term of five years at the same rental. Thirty-three days prior to the expiration of the extended term the tenant wrote the landlord, allegedly as required by> order of a government agency, announcing its intention to remove all…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Weber v. PowersIllinois Supreme Court · 1904
  2. Thiebaud v. First National BankIndiana Supreme Court · 1873
  3. Hurd v. WhitsettSupreme Court of Colorado · 1878
  4. Brown v. KayserWisconsin Supreme Court · 1884
  5. Zippar v. ReppySupreme Court of Colorado · 1890

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. First Interstate Bank v. Tanktech, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1993
  2. Mattas Motors, Inc. v. Heritage Homes of Nebraska, Inc.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1987
  3. Duke v. DavenportSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  4. Tanktech, Inc. v. First Interstate BankColorado Court of Appeals · 1992
  5. Hemberger v. HagemannSupreme Court of Colorado · 1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API