Legal Opinion

Brock v. Brock

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided March 2, 1944No. 5 Div. 386PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LIVINGSTON, Justice.

Suit by "Clemmie Brock against Charlie Brock, to declare a deed a mortgage, to redeem and for general relief. The respondent made his answer a cross-bill, and prays that the court will make and enter a decree declaring the transactions between the parties to be a conditional sale, and under which cross-respondent, Clemmie Brock, has lost all rights in and to the property involved, and for general relief. Decree denying relief to complainant, and granting relief to respondent and cross-complainant, in accordance with the prayer of the cross-bill. Complainant appealed.

•…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Smith v. SmithSupreme Court of Alabama · 1907
  2. Turner v. WilkinsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1882
  3. Burke v. TaylorSupreme Court of Alabama · 1891
  4. Winn v. FitzwaterSupreme Court of Alabama · 1907
  5. Irwin v. ColemanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1911

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Cousins v. CrawfordSupreme Court of Alabama · 1953
  2. Greene v. Associates (In Re Green)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Alabama · 2000
  3. Steward v. St. Regis Paper Co.District Court, S.D. Alabama · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API