Walters v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtGardner, P. J.
Paragraphs 3, 4, 8, 9, and 11 of the defendant’s demurrers of November 23, 1953, quoted above, are speaking demurrers and present no legal authority for quashing the indictment. In Cole v. State, 68 Ga. App. 179 (22 S. E. 2d 529), this court said: “A speaking demurrer is one which alleges some new matter, not disclosed by the pleading [indictment] against which the demurrer is aimed and not judicially known or legally presumed to be true. Such a demurrer presents no question for decision, and should never be sustained.” See also Arthur v. State, 146 Ga. 827 (2) (92 S. E. 637). In Jackson v.…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Hayes v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1912
- Arthur v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1917
- Sims v. MartinCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1925
- Jenkins v. JonesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1953
- Howard v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1921
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- M. W. Holloway v. Clay E. McElroy WardenCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
- Felker v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1984
- Johnson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1976
- State v. GivensCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1993
- French v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1959
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.