Legal Opinion · Dissent

Wallace v. Smyth

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided October 21, 1998No. 1-97-0467Published

1DissentJustice Burke

I respectfully disagree with the majority’s holding that in loco parentis status should not be extended to Maryville. Plaintiff alleged that Maryville was licensed to house, care for and educate wards of the state, its relationship with Waketta also entailed providing him with proper medication, discipline and supervision, and that “MARYVILLE ACADEMY acts as a contractual agent of the State of Illinois in caring for these children.” Based on these allegations, I believe that the trial court properly determined that Maryville stood in loco parentis to Waketta. I further would affirm the trial…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Currie v. LaoIllinois Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Estate of Johnson v. Condell Memorial HospitalIllinois Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Illinois Nurses Ass'n v. Illinois State Labor Relations BoardAppellate Court of Illinois · 1990
  4. Illinois Nurses Ass'n v. Illinois State Labor Relations BoardAppellate Court of Illinois · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API