Legal Opinion
Claim of Post v. Tennessee Products & Chemical Corp.
New York Court of Appeals
Decided June 4, 1964PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Order affirmed, with costs to respondent Workmen’s Compensation Board. No opinion.
Concur: Chief Judge Desmond and Judges Dye, Fuld and Burke. Judges Van Voorhis and Scileppi dissent and vote to reverse and to dismiss the claim upon the ground that as a matter of law decedent met his death solely as a result of intoxication. Taking no part: Judge Bregan.
2Cited by11 opinions
- Claim of Loucks v. Joy AutomaticsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
- Claim of Villapol v. American Landmark ManagementAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- Claim of Milz v. J & R Amusement Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
- Claim of Mikolajczyk v. New York State Department of TransportationAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
- Claim of Smith v. LSI Lighting ServicesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.