Hoffart v. Wiggins
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtEdmonds, P. J.
Plaintiffs appeal after the trial court granted summary judgment on their claim for financial abuse of a vulnerable person under ORS 124.110. We reverse and remand.
According to plaintiffs, they entrusted monies to defendants on different occasions beginning in 1982 so that defendant Hal Wiggins could invest on their behalf. The arrangement required defendants to pay a greater return of interest on the money than plaintiffs could obtain from other investment opportunities and required that the entire sum of money be returned to plaintiffs upon their request. In 2004, plaintiffs requested that…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Outdoor Media Dimensions Inc. v. StateOregon Supreme Court · 2001
- Church v. WoodsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003
3Cited by8 opinions
- Bates v. Bankers Life & Casualty Co.District Court, D. Oregon · 2014
- Lorraine Bates v. Bankers Life and Casualty CoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
- Verizon Northwest, Inc. v. Main Street Development, Inc.District Court, D. Oregon · 2010
- Bates v. Bankers Life and Casualty Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 2018
- Bates v. Bankers Life and Casualty Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 2018
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.