Baker v. Spath
District Court, District of Columbia
1Opinion of the Court
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA BRlGAl)IER GENERAL JOHN G. BAKER, U.S. MAR!NE CoRPS, PETITIoNER, No. 17-Cv-0231 l-RCL V. CoLoNEL VANCE SPATH, U.S. AIR FoRCE, in his official capacity; JAMES MATTls, SECRETARY oF DEFENSE, in his official capacity, § § § § § § , § § § § § § § § RESPONDENTS. Memorandum Opinion The Court has before it Brigadier General John G. Baker’s Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (the “Petition”). (ECF No. 1). Upon consideration, the Court concludes the following: ' l. That the presumption of collateral consequences applies to the contempt finding…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Sibron v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Spencer v. KemnaSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.