Legal Opinion

Baker v. Spath

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided June 18, 2018No. Civil Action No. 2017-2311Published

1Opinion of the Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA BRlGAl)IER GENERAL JOHN G. BAKER, U.S. MAR!NE CoRPS, PETITIoNER, No. 17-Cv-0231 l-RCL V. CoLoNEL VANCE SPATH, U.S. AIR FoRCE, in his official capacity; JAMES MATTls, SECRETARY oF DEFENSE, in his official capacity, § § § § § § , § § § § § § § § RESPONDENTS. Memorandum Opinion The Court has before it Brigadier General John G. Baker’s Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (the “Petition”). (ECF No. 1). Upon consideration, the Court concludes the following: ' l. That the presumption of collateral consequences applies to the contempt finding…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  4. Sibron v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  5. Spencer v. KemnaSupreme Court of the United States · 1998

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API