Legal Opinion

Orban v. Makarczyk

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 11, 1950No. Appeal, 1PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Arnold, J.,

Plaintiff recovered a judgment before an alderman in Luzerne County in the amount of $176.25 for wages. Defendant attempted to appeal.

The Act of 1870, P. L. 269, is a special act applying only to the County of Luzerne, and does not appear in Purdon’s Statutes. It reads: “Section 1. . . . That in all cases of appeals by defendants from the judgment of justices of the peace and aldermen in the county of Luzerne, obtained in any suit brought, . . . for the recovery of wages . . . the said defendant . . . shall, before any such appeal be granted, declare, on oath ... in…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Patterson v. Gallitzin Building & Loan Ass'nSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1903
  2. Butler E. & F. Co. v. Butler BoroughSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1913
  3. Young v. ColvinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1895

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Turner v. May Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  2. BURGOON v. ZH BD. of CHARLESTOWN T.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
  3. Burgoon v. Zoning Hearing BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
  4. Petitions for Review to Board of Finance & Revenue, Pennsylvania Department of Justice1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API