Orban v. Makarczyk
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Arnold, J.,
Plaintiff recovered a judgment before an alderman in Luzerne County in the amount of $176.25 for wages. Defendant attempted to appeal.
The Act of 1870, P. L. 269, is a special act applying only to the County of Luzerne, and does not appear in Purdon’s Statutes. It reads: “Section 1. . . . That in all cases of appeals by defendants from the judgment of justices of the peace and aldermen in the county of Luzerne, obtained in any suit brought, . . . for the recovery of wages . . . the said defendant . . . shall, before any such appeal be granted, declare, on oath ... in…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Patterson v. Gallitzin Building & Loan Ass'nSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1903
- Butler E. & F. Co. v. Butler BoroughSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1913
- Young v. ColvinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1895
3Cited by4 opinions
- Turner v. May Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
- BURGOON v. ZH BD. of CHARLESTOWN T.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
- Burgoon v. Zoning Hearing BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
- Petitions for Review to Board of Finance & Revenue, Pennsylvania Department of Justice1977