Legal Opinion
Sodexho Marriott Corp. v. District of Columbia Department of Employment Services
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided September 9, 2004No. 03-AA-481PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RUIZ, Associate Judge:
Sodexho Marriott Corporation petitions for review of a decision by the director of the D.C. Department of Employment Services (DOES), which affirmed a compensation order awarding workers’ compensation benefits to Trevor Rasbury, after concluding that Ms. Rasbury’s claim for additional wage loss benefits was not time-barred by the provision of the District of Columbia Workers’ Compensation Act of 1979 (the Act) that limits the time to review and modify benefits in light of changed conditions. See D.C.Code § 32-1524(a) (2001). Sodexho contends that the director erred…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Washington Times v. District of Columbia Department of Employment ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1999
- Short v. District of Columbia Department of Employment ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1998
- Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority v. District of Columbia Department of Employment ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2003
3Cited by6 opinions
- Fluellyn v. District of Columbia Department of Employment ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2012
- Nixon v. District of Columbia Department of Employment ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2008
- Jones v. District of Columbia Department of Employment ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2017
- Rayburn L. Levy v. District of Columbia Department of Employment Services and Washington Metropolitan Area Transit AuthorityDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2014
- Kelly v. D.C. Department of Employment Services & Potomac Electric Power CompanyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2019
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.