Legal Opinion · Dissent

Rinaldo v. McGovern

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 16, 1990Published

1Dissent

Callahan, J. P., and Balio, J.

(dissenting). The majority holds that, as a matter of law, an injured passenger in a vehicle which is lawfully proceeding on a highway adjacent to a golf course has no cause of action against the golfer who drives a golf ball into the windshield of the car causing the driver to lose control and crash. We disagree; such a ruling is contrary to long-established principles of law. Surely it is foreseeable that if a golfer drives a ball "out of bounds” onto the road it may strike an automobile. To absolve the golfer from fault against an innocent person is unjust.

Surp…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Palsgraf v. Long Island R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1928
  2. Sillman v. Twentieth Century-Fox Film Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1957
  3. Ugarriza v. SchmiederNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
  4. Munsey v. WebbSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  5. Goldstein v. County of MonroeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API