Legal Opinion

United States v. Peter Reiss Construction Co.

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided December 16, 1959No. 73, Docket 25668PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FRIENDLY, Circuit Judge.

The principal question on this appeal concerns the date when the Miller Act, 40 U.S.C.A. § 270b(a), requires notice to be given to a contractor by a material-man who has furnished supplies to a subcontractor pursuant to a series of orders as distinguished from an over-all contract. Judge Bruchhausen, in a reasoned opinion, held the notice was given too late. We agree.

The use plaintiff here is the same as in United States for Use and Benefit of J. A. Edwards & Company v. Thompson Construction Corp., 2 Cir., 273 F.2d 873. The subcontractor likewise is the same, Ben B.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States Ex Rel. P. A. Bourquin & Co. v. Chester Const. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1939
  2. United States v. Bregman Construction Corp.District Court, E.D. New York · 1959
  3. United States ex rel. Noland Co. v. Allied Contractors, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 1959

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States v. Peter Reiss Construction Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1959
  2. United States Ex Rel. a & M Petroleum, Inc. v. Santa Fe Engineers, Inc.District Court, S.D. Mississippi · 1987
  3. Webb v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API