United States v. Peter Reiss Construction Co.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
FRIENDLY, Circuit Judge.
The principal question on this appeal concerns the date when the Miller Act, 40 U.S.C.A. § 270b(a), requires notice to be given to a contractor by a material-man who has furnished supplies to a subcontractor pursuant to a series of orders as distinguished from an over-all contract. Judge Bruchhausen, in a reasoned opinion, held the notice was given too late. We agree.
The use plaintiff here is the same as in United States for Use and Benefit of J. A. Edwards & Company v. Thompson Construction Corp., 2 Cir., 273 F.2d 873. The subcontractor likewise is the same, Ben B.…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- United States Ex Rel. P. A. Bourquin & Co. v. Chester Const. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1939
- United States v. Bregman Construction Corp.District Court, E.D. New York · 1959
- United States ex rel. Noland Co. v. Allied Contractors, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 1959
3Cited by3 opinions
- United States v. Peter Reiss Construction Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1959
- United States Ex Rel. a & M Petroleum, Inc. v. Santa Fe Engineers, Inc.District Court, S.D. Mississippi · 1987
- Webb v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1971