State v. White
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
*304LENT, J.
The key issue is whether certain inculpatory statements made by the defendant stemmed from custodial interrogation as that term was defined by the Supreme Court of the United States in Miranda v. Arizona, 384 US 436, 86 S Ct 1602, 16 L Ed2d 694 (1966). That court said:
“By custodial interrogation, we mean questioning initiated by law enforcement officers after a person has been taken into custody or otherwise deprived of his freedom of action in any significant way.”
384 US at 444. A subsidiary issue is whether evidence seized in a search subsequent to defendant’s inculpatory statements…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Florida v. RoyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Escobedo v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Orozco v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- State v. KennedyOregon Supreme Court · 1983
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- State v. SmithOregon Supreme Court · 1986
- State v. HackworthCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984
- State v. HickamCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984
- State v. SadlerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1987
- State v. SadlerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1987
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.