Legal Opinion

Wiggin v. Dillon

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided November 23, 1909PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Error to Circuit Court, Baleigh County. Action by H. D. Wiggin against George W. Dillon. From an order setting aside the verdict and granting a new trial, plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

Roboinson, Judge:

Upon the trial of the right of ownership to lumber which had been levied upon, between a claimant of the property, Wiggin, and the execution creditor, Dillon, the jury found for the claim" ant. The verdict was set aside and a new trial awarded. This writ of error is prosecuted to the action of the court in disturbing the verdict.

The reason assigned by the court for its action in setting aside the verdict is that the one instruction that it gave to the jury on behalf of Wiggin was improper. The instruction told the jury to find for Wiggin if they believed from the evidence…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Acme Food Co. v. OlderWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1908

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Reilly v. NicollWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1913
  2. State v. BlackwellWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1926
  3. State v. HurleyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1916
  4. Burner v. Smith Coal Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1929
  5. Belknap v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1917

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API