Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Zorn

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided May 3, 2006No. 05-P-373PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKatzmann, J.

A criminal complaint was filed on May 16, 2003, charging the defendant, Robert H. Zorn, with indecent assault and battery on a child under the age of fourteen, along *229with several other charges. Upon reconsideration, a District Court judge allowed the defendant’s motion to suppress all evidence discovered by means of a search warrant executed at the defendant’s residence. The judge ruled that the information in the warrant affidavit was unreliable because the affiant received all her information through so-called “totem pole” hearsay and never spoke with the victim or her mother. We conclude…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Aguilar v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Spinelli v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. United States v. VentrescaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  4. Commonwealth v. UptonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1985
  5. Commonwealth v. CinelliMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1983

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Finamore v. MiglionicoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2021
  2. Commonwealth v. RabbMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2007
  3. Commonwealth v. David EllisMassachusetts Superior Court · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API