Legal Opinion

Pittsburgh Rys. Co. v. Thomas

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided November 29, 1909No. 49PublishedCited by 8 opinions

In Error to the- Circuit Court of the United States for the. Western District- of Pennsylvania-. Action- by 'David T. Thomas against the Pittsburgh Railways Company. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

GRAY, Circuit Judge.

The defendant in error, David F. Thomas i hereinafter called the plaintiff), brought suit against the Pittsburgh Railways Company, the plaintiff in error (hereinafter called the defendant), to recover damages for injuries to the said plaintiff, occasioned by the alleged negligence of the defendant. There was a verdict, and judgment thereon, in favor of the plaintiff. From the record brought up by the writ of error sued out by the defendant, it appears that the defendant was a corporation of the state of Pennsylvania, operating certain electric street railways in what was…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Frazier v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1861

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Guedon v. RooneyOregon Supreme Court · 1938
  2. Clark v. StewartOhio Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Lix v. GastianMissouri Court of Appeals · 1953
  4. Peters v. HenshawMissouri Court of Appeals · 1982
  5. R. J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. v. NewbyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1944

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API