Legal Opinion

Bahl v. City of Asbury

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided December 22, 2006No. 04-1540PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STREIT, Justice.

“A rose may still be a rose if called by another name but not so for manufactured housing.” 1 We are called on to determine whether a “mobile home” is a “manufactured home.” Developers claim the City of Asbury unlawfully discriminates against “mobile home” parks through zoning restrictions. Developers contend Iowa law requires “mobile homes” — the kind with hitches, wheels, and/or axles — be treated the same as traditional homes built on site. We find the statute in question, which prohibits cities from discriminating against “manufactured housing,” only pertains to…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Wilmoth v. WilcoxTexas Supreme Court · 1987
  2. United Fire & Casualty Co. v. Shelly Funeral Home, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2002
  3. Wolfe v. GraetherSupreme Court of Iowa · 1986
  4. State v. SchultzSupreme Court of Iowa · 1999
  5. Iowa Department of Transportation v. SowardSupreme Court of Iowa · 2002

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Tina Elizabeth Lee v. State of Iowa and Polk County Clerk of CourtSupreme Court of Iowa · 2016
  2. State of Iowa v. Jeffrey K. RaglandSupreme Court of Iowa · 2012
  3. Dennis L. Cawthorn v. Catholic Health Initiatives Iowa Corp. D/B/A Mercy Hospital Medical Center, a CorporationSupreme Court of Iowa · 2011
  4. Anderson Financial Services, LLC v. MillerSupreme Court of Iowa · 2009
  5. Dohmen v. Iowa Department for the BlindCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 2010

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API