Legal Opinion

Difilippo v. Rayle

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided December 19, 1996No. 87706Published

1Per curiam

We accepted jurisdiction to review Difilippo v. Rayle, 669 So.2d 306 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996), because the district court affirmed with citation to its prior decision in Cerniglia v. Cerniglia, 655 So.2d 172 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995), which was pending review in this Court. Art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const.; see also Jollie v. State, 405 So.2d 418 (Fla.1981).

However, we have since approved the Cerniglia decision. Cerniglia v. Cerniglia, 679 So.2d 1160 (Fla.1996). Thus, because the decision below is consistent with our decision in Cerniglia, we deny the petition for review for lack of jurisdiction.

No motion…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Jollie v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1981
  2. Cerniglia v. CernigliaSupreme Court of Florida · 1996
  3. Cerniglia v. CernigliaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995
  4. Difilippo ex rel. Difilippo v. RayleDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API