People v. Ruiz
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.
Without more, in the circumstances revealed by this record we cannot say as a matter of law that the trial court abused its discretion when it denied the defendant’s request for a lineup made at a time when, some five months after the initial indentification, it is not disputed the defendant presented a somewhat altered appearance.
As to appellant’s contention that, despite an otherwise unobjectionable charge on the burden of proof, the Trial Judge should have granted the request that the jury be instructed…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- People v. BarnesNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
- People v. GerardNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
3Cited by40 opinions
- People v. LowenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
- People v. RoldanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- People v. LewisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- People v. RaphaelAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
- People v. DurhamAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.