Teick v. Board of Commissioners
Supreme Court of Minnesota
This action was brought in the District Court for Scott county. The complaint alleges that the defendant, without the consent and against the will' of the plaintiff, broke into and entered upon certain lands and premises of the plaintiff situate in Carver county, under and by virtue of an act of the Legislature, entitled “ An act to locate and open a State road from Yorkville, in Carver county, to intersect the Saint Paul road, south of Gibson’s, in Bloomington Township,…
Read the full summary
This action was brought in the District Court for Scott county. The complaint alleges that the defendant, without the consent and against the will' of the plaintiff, broke into and entered upon certain lands and premises of the plaintiff situate in Carver county, under and by virtue of an act of the Legislature, entitled “ An act to locate and open a State road from Yorkville, in Carver county, to intersect the Saint Paul road, south of Gibson’s, in Bloomington Township, Hennepin county,” approved March 4th, 1863, and took, converted and appropriated about six acres thereof to and for the…
1Opinion of the Court
*294 By the Oourt
'"Wilson, Ch. J.
The plaintiff in his complaint
alleges that the defendant was seized of the land in question, and that while he was so seized the defendant, under and by virtue of an act of the Legislature entitled “ An act to locate and open a State road from Yorkville, Carver county, to intersect the St. Paul road, south of Gibson’s, in Bloomington Township, Hennepin county,” approved March 4, 18.63, and without his consent, and against his will, broke and entered the said premises and took and converted and appropriated about six acres thereof to and for the purposes named in…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Tudor v. LewisCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1860
- Stevens v. Proprietors of the Middlesex CanalMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1815