United States v. Nagorney
District Court, D. Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
HOPKINS, District Judge.
The action is on a promissory note. Defendants in answer have pleaded fraud and want of consideration. No question is raised but that the United States acquired the note in due course. The question of negotiability is the only one for present consideration. An order was entered submitting for determination in advance of trial the question, “Is the note sued upon a negotiable instrument?”
Defendants, the Nagorneys, executed the note to one J. S. Batchel for the installation of a furnace. Batchel transferred the note, and it came into the possession of the United States…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Leach v. UrschelSupreme Court of Kansas · 1923
- Clark v. SkeenSupreme Court of Kansas · 1900
- Richards v. BarlowMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1885
- Jones v. TurnerMichigan Supreme Court · 1930
- Wisconsin Yearly Meeting of Freewill Baptists v. BablerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1902
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- United States v. SchaefferDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1940