Legal Opinion

United States v. Nagorney

District Court, D. Kansas

Decided July 19, 1939No. 4239PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

HOPKINS, District Judge.

The action is on a promissory note. Defendants in answer have pleaded fraud and want of consideration. No question is raised but that the United States acquired the note in due course. The question of negotiability is the only one for present consideration. An order was entered submitting for determination in advance of trial the question, “Is the note sued upon a negotiable instrument?”

Defendants, the Nagorneys, executed the note to one J. S. Batchel for the installation of a furnace. Batchel transferred the note, and it came into the possession of the United States…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Leach v. UrschelSupreme Court of Kansas · 1923
  2. Clark v. SkeenSupreme Court of Kansas · 1900
  3. Richards v. BarlowMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1885
  4. Jones v. TurnerMichigan Supreme Court · 1930
  5. Wisconsin Yearly Meeting of Freewill Baptists v. BablerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1902

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. United States v. SchaefferDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API