Legal Opinion

People v. Inskeep

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 31, 2012PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Memorandum: Defendant appeals from an order determining that he is a level three risk pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act (Correction Law § 168 et seq.). We reject defendant’s contention that County Court erred in granting the request of the Board of Examiners of Sex Offenders for an upward departure from defendant’s presumptive level two risk to a level three risk. The court’s determination is supported by clear and convincing evidence of “ ‘an aggravating . . . factor of a kind, or to a degree, not otherwise adequately taken into account by the [risk assessment] guidelines’ ”…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. People v. McCollumAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. People v. GiffordAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
  2. GIFFORD, DONALD E., PEOPLE vAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
  3. People v. GiffordAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API