Legal Opinion

Vaughn v. Missouri Pacific Railroad

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided March 17, 1885PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Appeal from the St. Louis County Circuit Court, Edwards, J.

1Opinion of the CourtThompson, J.

It is recited in the bill of exceptions that the defendant’s motions for new trial and in arrest of judgment were filed within four days after verdict and judgment; but the record affirmatively shows that the verdict and judgment were rendered on the 23rd of June, 1884, and that the motions for new trial and v in arrest of judgment were filed on the 30th day of August, 1884. These motions were not, therefore, “made within four days after the trial,” as required by the statute. — Rev. Stat. sect. 3707. It follows, upon a well settled rule of procedure, that we can consider nothing except what…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Iba v. Hannibal & St. Joseph RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1870
  2. State v. MetzgerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1857
  3. Bates v. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1881
  4. Brecht v. CorbyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1879
  5. Keane v. Bartholow, Lewis & Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1877

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Babb v. BruereMissouri Court of Appeals · 1886
  2. Turner v. BondalierMissouri Court of Appeals · 1888
  3. Sturges v. BottsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1887
  4. Lindsay v. Kansas City, Fort Scott & Memphis RailroadMissouri Court of Appeals · 1889
  5. Jones v. Chicago, Burlington & Kansas City Railway Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1893

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API