Legal Opinion

East India Co. v. Marsh & McLennan, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided October 29, 1981No. 62573Published

1Opinion

On Motion for Rehearing.

The appellants have made a motion to rehear in this case contending that the judgment appealed from dismissing the case for lack of prosecution must be set aside insofar as the language “with prejudice” is involved under the authority of Johnson v. Hooks, 156 Ga. App. 257 (274 SE2d 666) (1980) and Maolud v. Keller, 153 Ga. App. 268 (265 SE2d 86) (1980). Both these cases reversed an order of dismissal which had become final based on Spyropoulos v. John Linard Estate, 243 Ga. 518 (255 SE2d 40) (1979). Our decision is in line with Trice v. Howard, 234 Ga. 189 (214 SE2d…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Spyropoulos v. John Linard EstateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1979
  2. Maolud v. KellerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1980
  3. Burns & Ledbetter, Inc. v. Primark Marking Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1979
  4. Johnson v. HooksCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1980
  5. Mosley v. LankfordSupreme Court of Georgia · 1979

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API